I have sent you on several occasions a considerable amount of material which indicates that Francis has produced Catholic teaching which is not Catholic.
There are examples in the Dubia, which have yet to be addressed by the Vatican.
In the documents provided, there is evidence which leads to the conclusion that Francis is an antipope.
There is the allegation of heresy, which has not been refuted. Among other things, Francis openly denies the teaching on Hell and the status of husbands as head of the family. He also raises the possibility of receiving the Blessed Sacrament in the state of mortal sin.
And there is the apparent illegitimacy of the conclave which elected Francis. Cardinals openly boasting of campaigning in a manner forbidden by Universi Dominici Gregis.
Any one of these would be sufficient to cast doubt on the status of Francis.
In times of doubt, it would seem to be the task of the Church to clear up contradictions and advise the faithful of exactly where the truth lies.
I should be grateful if these doubts could be addressed and cleared up.
October 2022
Dear Archbishop Porteous
In an article copied below, you are reported to have said the following: Archbishop Porteous said the statement about wives being subject to their husbands reflected the culture of the time it was written. "[St Paul] then presents a radical vision of marriage inspired by Christian belief in the equal dignity of men and women. Because he calls on husbands to sacrifice themselves for their wives as Christ sacrificed himself for the Church."
This gives the impression that submission of a wife to her husband was intended to apply only to the people of the time of St Paul. That is, it no longer has any effect.
I should be grateful if you, as appointed teacher of the Church, could give a clear answer to these questions:
Do wives need to submit to their husbands? If not, then can you point to any document issued by the Church formally renouncing this Biblical requirement, or declaring that the teaching no longer applies?
If the answer is no, then it follows that husbands no longer need to love their wives. Since the two requirements are paired, I believe that it will be necessary for both statements to be confirmed one way or the other.
Ephesians 521 Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ. 22 Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord.23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior.24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. 25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her
Colossians 318 Wives, submit yourselves to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. 19 Husbands, love your wives and do not be harsh with them.
1 Peter 3
3 Wives, likewise, submit to your own husbands. Do this so that even if some of them refuse to believe the word, they may be won without a word by their wives’ way of life.
I believe that it is not unreasonable to divide Australian Catholics into three groups.
Group A: These suspect that something is amiss in the Vatican, but cannot put their finger on it. They are leaving this problem to the bishops in the hope that the situation will be sorted out.
Group B: These Catholics see the misdeeds of Francis and the Cardinals, but believe that everything will be all right because God would not allow the forces of darkness to take over the Vatican.
Group C: These believe that the election of Francis was not truly kosher, and that he may be some sort of heretic. This group is moving to the position that Francis is an anti-pope.
The documents below address some of the arguments that Francis is a fraud. That his election was invalid, that he appears to be a heretic, and that the 'resignation' of Benedict was not what people think it was. Any one of these three arguments could make Francis illegitimate.
The evidence for these claims is not given in great detail. Yet this evidence is massive and easily obtained on the internet.
I shall copy one of these documents in full below this email.
I should be grateful if you could either refute these arguments, demonstrating that Francis is a good and holy pope, or advise what can be done to save the souls in your care from the grave danger of following a false leader.
Most Rev Christopher Prowse Archbishop of Canberra and Goulburn
Dear Archbishop Prowse
The assignment below has been attributed to Year 9 at St Clare's College in Canberra.
It includes an exceptional number of sodomites and lesbians, far out of proportion to their numbers in actual society.
I cannot remember having heard over the last half century from the pulpit any teaching about this sin which cries out to Heaven for vengeance, and yet our politicians have just happily made it legitimate for these perverted people to 'marry' each other.
Would it not be possible for you to contact the school and point out the constant teaching of the Church? That those who commit this disgusting sin, even just once, and then die unrepentant, will suffer atrocious pain, unrelieved for all eternity.
As Catholics we are bound to believe in Hell, or cease being Catholic. Would it not be appropriate to ask the teacher or teachers responsible at St Clare's if they believe that Church teaching on sodomy has been somewhat revised, and why?
April 2022 Most Rev Christopher Prowse Archbishop of Canberra and Goulburn
Dear Archbishop Prowse
You will see from the links below that it seems that a Catholic institution has somehow invited a lesbian to address a function to be held on Catholic property, 'behind the chapel'.
How could a Catholic institution permit this? Do those who organise these events somehow think that those who live an unnatural lifestyle are suitable speakers for parents and grandparents of students?
The article below suggests that there are Australian bishops and priests who are Freemasons. I have heard this message independently from other sources over a lengthy period of time, and if this is true, then it appears that there are bishops and priests who have placed themselves outside the Church.
It is important to us as Catholics that we avoid attending Masses celebrated sacrilegiously by excommunicated priests and bishops, so I'd be grateful if you could advise how we can be sure of avoiding such Masses.
And for the good of the eternal destination of the souls of these misguided bishops and priests, is there some way they can be warned about the consequences of Freemasonry?
The document below has been available on the internet for more than 3 years, and I have not seen any attempt to refute it. It seems to suggest that bishops are unable to perform their tasks because someone, presumably in the Vatican, has information which they don't wish to be made public.
This places priests in a difficult position as regards their conscience, particularly those who believe that the vaccine is immoral, derived from the killing of unborn babies.
There is also the belief among orthodox Catholics, including priests, that the vaccines at present available have been found to seriously injure and kill healthy people, including children.
That is, since the fifth commandment requires us to take good care of our health and life, a priest might be justified in believing that taking the vaccine could place him in the state of mortal sin.
Given that those opposing the vaccine include many eminent scientists and physicians who are untainted by association with those who stand to benefit financially from selling the vaccine (such as TV channels running large numbers of lucrative government ads pushing the vaccine), it is not impossible that some priests might in good conscience be reluctant to take the vaccine.
Below I have copied some of the headlines from the last ten days. I have not included any from the mainstream media, since all those are readily available.
There are reports that cast doubt on the vaccines presently available, claiming that since the virus has not been isolated, there can be no true vaccine, unless someone has changed the definition of the word 'vaccine'.
I should be grateful if you could advise whether it is possible for a priest to reject the vaccine in good conscience.
There seems to be a general acceptance among Catholics that Islam is a religion of peace, and that any violence by Muslims against non-Muslims can be attributed to extremists and criminals rather than true believers.
Since Christians are being murdered around the world by Muslims who are simply following the dictates of Islam, it would seem just that the Church tell Catholics the truth about Islam.
Below this email I have given a list of today's headlines about Christianity and Islam. There is no equivalence to be seen. It is quite reasonable to form the view that the news about Christianity features corruption among Christians, whilst that of Islam focuses on violence. I have such daily lists going back several years and they have the same message day in and day out.
Islam does have messages of peace, but these are abrogated by the verses of violence. What matters is that Muslims who follow their faith strictly believe in that violence. Finding a true believing Muslim who rejects violence would be a real challenge.
Given that many Catholics appear to be in ignorance about the dangers of Islam, would it not be a good thing for our bishops and clergy to provide them with more accurate information?
Put another way, does the Church not teach that the teachings and practices of Islam lead to eternal damnation?
Over a frighteningly-short period of time, we have seen the legalisation of abortion, sodomite 'marriage', and euthanasia legalised. I heard very little from the pulpit about these satanic horrors and their effect on souls.
None of them could have been effected without the active compliance of MPs who claim to be Catholic. These seem to have attracted very little attention from religious leaders.
Fortunately we have a precedent where a bishop publicly confronted evil. St Ambrose of Milan kept an emperor outside the church until he did penance.
I am trying to think of a reason that an Australian bishop could not do the same with those Catholic politicians who actively oppose Catholic teaching.
It seems to me a tragedy that Muslim women openly celebrate the suicide jihad of their sons. They are proclaiming the new life of their offspring in Jannah with a large number of perpetual virgins (or raisins), which these sons have earned by violently murdering a number of innocents.
And yet, as Catholics, we know that there are no Muslims in Heaven. Not even one.
The activities of these men constitute grave sin, one which cries out to Heaven for vengeance. Those who die unrepentant of these sins spend eternity in Hell with demons for company.
Where is the warning from our bishops to Muslims who practise or support jihad?
Internet activity reveals that a substantial number of believing Catholics now doubt or openly deny the legitimacy of Francis as Pope.
I have seen no denial of the serious allegations of his claimed heresies or the alleged illegitimacy of his status. Nor have I seen any move by Francis to address the Dubia which comprehensively analyse purported doctrinal errors in Amoris Laetitia.
As time passes, more Catholics seem to be moving from doubting the legitimacy of Francis, rather toward regarding him openly as an Antipope, believing Benedict to be the true Pope. And if they are correct, this would appear to place bishops united with Francis in a difficult situation.
Given that the Dubia have gone unaddressed for more than 5 years, I believe that it is not unreasonable for Catholics to desire an explanation. It would appear that such an explanation should come from bishops.
I should be grateful if you would advise whether the questions asked in the Dubia are valid, and if so, what should be done to clarify the situation. If you can show that I have said anything uncharitable or untrue in the above I shall of course apologise.
You will see from the abbreviated list below this email that the Church appears to be overrun with sodomites. And from among sodomites we get child molesters.
The first link below lists Australian priests and religious who have molested children. Almost all of them molested boys, even though sodomites formed between one and two percent of the male population at the time the crimes were committed.
I have not heard a priest or bishop speak from the pulpit about sodomy, and I am at daily Mass. Yet no one can pretend that the problem does not exist.
My questions are three.
What on earth are sodomites doing in positions of authority in an organisation founded by God?
Where is the effort on the part of bishops to remove from positions of authority those priests and bishops who defend this poison?
Given that this sin, which directs men to eternal horror, is one which the Church classifies as a sin crying out to Heaven for vengeance, where is the outrage from those who are charged with defending the faith?
It seems that Catholics are faced with a serious problem.
Francis has issued a document which reportedly allows bishops to ban the traditional Latin Mass.
This Mass would appear protected by Quo Primum of St Pius V: “We grant in perpetuity that this Missal is hereafter freely and lawfully to be used, without any scruple of conscience or fear of incurring any penalty or censure…No one whosoever is permitted to alter this notice of Our permission, statute, ordinance, command, precept, grant, indult, declaration, will, decree, and prohibition. Should anyone dare to contravene it, let him know that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.”
Given that Christ told Peter that ‘Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven’ ( Matthew 16:19 ), it is difficult to avoid the argument that Francis is opposing Christ.
Below this email are two annexes. First, the reaction of Catholics to this latest document. And second, arguments which indicate serious impediments to the election of Francis.
I should be grateful for an explanation of what is the true situation, particularly in view of the great danger to souls of leaving such doubts unresolved. The question can be summarised: Is Francis Pope, or is he an Antipope?
If I have said anything inaccurate here please correct me.
2 The Election of Francis was null and void. Pope John Paul 2 issued an instruction which made conclaves invalid where canvassing or manipulation took place, and the participant cardinals excommunicated.
297. It is a matter of reaching out to everyone, of needing to help each person find his or her proper way of participating in the ecclesial community and thus to experience being touched by an “unmerited, unconditional and gratuitous” mercy. No one can be condemned for ever, because that is not the logic of the Gospel! Here I am not speaking only of the divorced and remarried, but of everyone, in whatever situation they find themselves.
4 In addition to the three points above, there are indications that the behaviour of Francis and his entourage has not been in keeping with the office he claims to occupy.
In summary, the amount of information available on the points above is extensive. So far I am not aware of any denial of the claimed facts.
July 2021
Dear Archbishop Coleridge
The biblical sentence for sodomy was death (Lev 20:13). However, there seems to be a modern view that perhaps God did not really know what He was doing when He declared His judgement.
It could be argued that sentencing sodomites to death is not unreasonable.
It gives the guilty man time and opportunity to repent, thus permitting him to achieve eternal happiness.
It deters others who might be tempted to follow the guilty in depravity.
It saves the souls of children who might be snared by these evil men, since homosexuals corrupt children (go here and count the number of Australian priests who corrupted boys).
Until fairly recently sodomy was illegal. Somehow it has become respectable, and aggressively so. That is, our society thinks it knows better than God.
On the other hand, I believe that God's ideas are not necessarily outdated. Maybe He had it right all along.
If you agree with this, is there any reason why you would feel that our bishops would be unable to promote the restoration of God's expressed choice?
Revelation 21:8 But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars—they will be consigned to the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death.”
Please see below my email to Archbishop Coleridge.
I have since learned that there appear to be attempts elsewhere to introduce the normalisation of the disgusting practices of sodomy into Australian Catholic schools. If it is happening in Queensland Catholic schools, there is the danger that the cancer has spread elsewhere.
The instigators do not seem content with destroying their own souls, but want to take the souls of innocent children with them into eternal darkness. Have they not read Matt 18:6?
The pains of Hell are not to be dismissed, as appears to be happening here. There is only one thing in life that matters: the state of the soul at death.
This ugliness taking over Catholic schools seems to me to present a matter which requires immediate action. Is it possible that this could be done before souls are lost?
I believe that bishops have a duty to remove instantly from Catholic schools any staff promoting sodomy. Please tell me if I am wrong here.
On Monday, 24 May 2021, 05:32:42 GMT+10, wrote:
Dear Archbishop Coleridge
I believe that the information below requires immediate action.
It is not the purpose of a Catholic school to openly promote a lifestyle of sin.
Particularly a sin so ugly and offensive as sodomy.
Please see the material below, which comes from St Patrick's Shorncliffe.
I believe that this is a matter for which Churchill would call Action This Day.
I have compiled and attached the headlines for Islam and Christianity over a period of three days. I believe that this gives an insight into the differences between the two religions.
In the Christian (left) column the main theme appears to be corruption in the Catholic Church. In the Islam (right) column, the overwhelming nature of Islam comes across as generating outrageous violence.
I have about 5 years of similar data, which would appear to reinforce the document attached.
If these headlines (which include links) are typical of the two religions, then is it not appropriate that both issues, corruption and violence, need to be addressed, and with urgency, by our bishops?
May 2021
Dear Australian Bishops
Any priest or bishop who has read Fr Malachi Martin's Windswept House would be aware of two things.
1 The list of active homosexuals uncovered among the clergy and the list of satanists overlap so significantly as to indicate almost a single group. That is, many satanists among the clergy would seem to be sodomites, and vice versa. And their power is such that satanic rites have been celebrated in the Vatican.
2 Masonic lodges exercise considerable influence over much of the higher ranks of the Church.
The question now arises, are those in the Vatican working to save souls? Or to destroy them?
Given that Francis has made cast doubt on infallible Church teaching (see Amoris Laetitia and the Dubia, which remain unanswered after more than 4 years), it is necessary to ask whether Francis is mistaken, or is he actually promoting heresy? And this leads to a further concern: is Francis part of the problem?
If the links below arouse a suspicion that all is not well, then a second question arises: What should be done, and by whom? It is my belief that the fate of many souls could rest on the answer.
It must be more than 60 years since I heard anything about contraception from the pulpit. Now it may be that priests think there are more important issues to talk about, like global warming and asylum seekers. Yet the fact remains that churches are all but empty of young people.
So it is not unreasonable to assume that Catholics are refusing to have babies at the same rate as our Protestant friends.
And each deliberate refusal, no matter the method (pills, devices or abstinence) would appear to constitute a serious offence to God, Such an offence as would land a person in Hell if unrepented.
Because our clergy never mention it any more, Catholics have somehow assumed that it's not a serious problem - if it was a problem, they feel that the priests would then be shouting it from the housetops.
It seems to me that those people who are rejecting the babies God wishes to send them are going to have a severe reminder of their error when they appear before their Divine Judge. I cannot see how the same fate might not apply to those bishops and priests who have made a decision not to raise the subject.
There is also a human dimension to refusing, or even delaying, to have children. God intends motherhood for the young, and women who delay having children might find it not so easy. This can result in going through life childless, and having no family support in old age.
I believe it is God's will that married couples have all the babies God wills to send them. Should we not be warning young couples about the need to have babies now, while they still can? And the consequences, if they don't?
Around 80 years ago there was in Germany a socialist movement, in which large industrial organisations became part of a socialist government apparatus. It was called National Socialism, or Nazism, and its supremacist activities inevitably led to war. One of its features was overt racism.
Today we have in China a movement modelled on Nazism. All large Chinese industries have a party leader at the helm. The party is overtly socialist and racist, and promotes Chinese supremacy. International conventions are defied or ignored. It bullies its neighbours and threatens anyone who dares question its authority.
Back in the Nazi era, the Church rightly called out the evils of Nazism.
So far I have not seen anyone in authority in the Church condemn this re-run of Nazism in China, which would seem to have Satan as its author and champion. I have not seen any serious condemnation of the handing over to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) the innocent Catholics of China.
In fact, there are indications that the CCP is buying influence in the Vatican.
Would it be reasonable for Cathollcs to expect their bishops to issue some statement clarifying exactly what is going on? And perhaps preparing Australians for a possible coming war?
Given that the Church teaches infallibly that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church, and that this teaching can never be overturned (else it would not be infallible), it would seem that those who die outside the Church are damned.
This means that, unless they achieved some form of repentance before death, Christian leaders such as Luther, Calvin, Knox, Cranmer, Henry VIII and other reformers, and also non-Christians such as Muhammad, now reside in Hell.
Would it not be an act of charity to tell the followers of these leaders that they are in great danger of sharing the same fate at death? Would such advice not give them an opportunity to make provision for their eternal future?
Pope Eugene IV, in the Bull Cantate Domino, 1441, proclaimed ex cathedra: "The Most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, also Jews, heretics, and schismatics can ever be partakers of eternal life, but that they are to go into the eternal fire 'which was prepared for the devil and his angels' (Mt. 25:41) unless before death they are joined with Her... No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ can be saved unless they abide within the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church."
There is one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which no one at all can be saved. Pope Innocent III, ex cathedra, (Fourth Lateran Council, 1215).
We declare, say , define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff. Pope Boniface VIII, (Unam Sanctam, 1302).
St. Irenaeus (130-202), Bishop and Martyr: "The Church is the entrance to life; all others are thieves and robbers. On this account we are bound to avoid them . . . . We hear it declared of the unbelieving and the blinded of this world that they shall not inherit the world of life which is to come . . . . Resist them in defense of the only true and life giving faith, which the Church has received from the Apostles and imparted to her sons."St. Augustine (354-430), Bishop and Doctor of the Church: "No man can find salvation except in the Catholic Church. Outside the Catholic Church one can have everything except salvation. One can have honor, one can have sacraments, one can sing alleluia, one can answer amen, one can have faith in the Name of the Father and the Son and of the Holy Ghost, and preach it too, but never can one find salvation except in the Catholic Church." St. Fulgentius (468-533), Bishop: "Most firmly hold and never doubt that not only pagans, but also Jews, all heretics, and all schismatics who finish this life outside of the Catholic Church, will go into eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels." Pope St. Gregory the Great (590-604): "The holy universal Church teaches that it is not possible to worship God truly except in Her and asserts that all who are outside of Her will not be saved." St. Francis of Assisi (1182-1226): "All who have not believed that Jesus Christ was really the Son of God are doomed. Also, all who see the Sacrament of the Body of Christ and do not believe it is really the most holy Body and Blood of the Lord . . . these also are doomed!" St. Thomas Aquinas (1226-1274), the Angelic Doctor: There is no entering into salvation outside the Catholic Church, just as in the time of the Flood there was not salvation outside the Ark, which denotes the Church." St. Louis Marie de Montfort (1673-1716): "There is no salvation outside the Catholic Church. Anyone who resists this truth perishes." St. Robert Bellarmine (1542-1621), Bishop and Doctor of the Church: "Outside the Church there is no salvation...therefore in the symbol (Apostles Creed) we join together the Church with the remission of sins: 'I believe in the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins"...For this reason the Church is compared to the Ark of Noah, because just as during the deluge, everyone perished who was not in the ark, so now those perish who are not in the Church." St. Alphonsus Maria de Liguori (1696-1787), Bishop and Doctor of the Church: "All the misfortunes of unbelievers spring from too great an attachment to the things of life. This sickness of heart weakens and darkens the understanding, and leads to eternal ruin. If they would try to heal their hearts by purging them of their vices, they would soon receive light, which would show them the necessity of joining the Catholic Church, where alone is salvation. We should constantly thank the Lord for having granted us the gift of the true Faith, by associating us with the children of the Holy Catholic Church ... How many are the infidels, heretics, and schismatics who do not enjoy the happiness of the true Faith! Earth is full of them and they are all lost!" Pope Pius XII (1939-1958): Some say they are not bound by the doctrine which teaches that the Mystical Body of Christ and the Roman Catholic Church are one and the same thing. Some reduce to a meaningless formula the necessity of belonging to the true Church in order to gain eternal salvation. Others finally belittle the reasonable character of the credibility of Christian Faith. These and like ERRORS, it is clear, have crept in among certain of our sons who are deceived by imprudent zeal for souls or by false science."
April 2021
Dear Archbishop Coleridge
If the article below is to be believed, and I have seen many others from respected writers which contain the same message, then the higher echelons of the Church are saturated with active sodomites.
Given that this evil brought God to the point of raining fire down on Sodom and its neighbours, and that it is one of four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance, then it would seem inappropriate for a priest, bishop or cardinal to retain any office in the Church if he professes that sodomy is somehow acceptable in Christianity.
This is a request for you and your brother bishops first to publicly denounce the utter depravity of this most disgusting sin; secondly to demonstrate from your own records that priests who molest children overwhelmingly prey on boys; and thirdly to suggest to all Australian bishops that those with homosexual inclinations are unfit to hold any position in the Church in Australia.
Fourthly, where priests or bishops indicate compromise on sodomy, to remind them that the Church must be obeyed, else the Church will be laid open to the consequences of scandal. And fifthly, to formally request the Vatican authorities to remove any cardinal, bishop or priest in the Vatican who has been credibly accused of sodomitic activity, at least until any allegations have been properly investigated.
Now I might be wrong about all this. If so, please correct me. But if this information has real substance, given that souls are at stake, I should be grateful if action could be taken in time to save those souls.
Every church I have been to in this archdiocese seems to have a roster of extraordinary ministers, which rather transforms them into something more ordinary.
Yet the Church, in her wisdom, apparently prefers that unconsecrated hands never touch the sacred Host.
It is unlikely that the whole archdiocese is full of priests too aged or sick to distribute the Blessed Sacrament, and the congregations are dreadfully small.
So it appears to me that there is an epidemic of disobedience among the clergy.
Below I have copied paragraph 11 from Inaestimabile Donum. Redemptionis Sacramentum does not disagree. If lay 'ministers' are for emergencies, then those rosters are surely predicting a regular supply of these emergencies, which some might think is a contradiction.
If I am wrong on this, please correct me. But if right, does this not leave priestly souls in great danger?
The faithful, whether religious or lay, who are authorized as extraordinary ministers of the Eucharist can distribute Communion only when there is no priest, deacon or acolyte, when the priest is impeded by illness or advanced age, or when the number of the faithful going to Communion is so large as to make the celebration of Mass excessively long.[20] Accordingly, a reprehensible attitude is shown by those priests who, though present at the celebration, refrain from distributing Communion and leave this task to the laity.
Media coverage suggests that you have spoken in favour of blessing those engaged in sodomitic 'marriage'.
It could be argued that such an act amounts to asking God to give His blessing to a sin.
Given the seriousness with which the Church treats this sin against nature, would it be appropriate to let parishioners know that these reports have failed to provide a faithful presentation of your meaning?
Below is a selection of Catholic news links for the month of March this year. This news is overwhelmingly bad, and some Catholic writers have indicated that the Catholic Church has been allowed to descend into atrophy through neglect by those appointed to defend it.
Of course, this assessment may be wrong. I'd be grateful if you could demonstrate that this news is perhaps exaggerated or misleading, and that souls are not as endangered as the links would appear to indicate.
Below is a partial list of links on the activities of Muslims for the month of March this year. So far as I can see, most of all events are in conformity with accepted Islamic practice, and no Islamic authority has denied their validity.
Unless these links are in error, then Islam cannot with honesty be considered a religion of peace, particularly as Christians are often the target of these infamous actions.
Should Catholics be warned about the danger to their souls of Muslims who practise the teachings of their religion?
